On this page
Asset Type
Manufacturer
Advanced Sterilization Products (ASP)
Model
What This Guide Helps With
Troubleshoot unexpectedly long cycles or repeated phases caused by load preparation, moisture, chamber conditions, vacuum performance, or developing system problems.
Step-by-Step Troubleshooting
1. Protect Sterile Processing Workflow
If the cycle eventually completes normally and all required indicators are acceptable, do not assume a sterilization failure solely because staff perceived it as slow.
However, if the unit repeatedly stalls, aborts, or behaves unpredictably, move urgent processing to another verified sterilizer.
Expected outcome: Patient-care workflow continues without relying on an unreliable sterilization process.
2. Confirm the Actual Cycle Behavior
Determine:
- Cycle selected
- Expected versus observed workflow
- Which phase appears prolonged
- Whether a phase truly repeats
- Whether the cycle completes successfully
- Whether the condition affects all loads
- Exact messages shown during the delay
Use available cycle records when appropriate rather than relying only on recollection.
Expected outcome: The complaint is confirmed as an actual process change rather than normal variation or an incorrect cycle selection.
3. Verify Correct Cycle Selection
Confirm the selected cycle is appropriate for the load and that staff are comparing it with the same cycle type previously used.
Do not alter protected configuration values simply to shorten a cycle.
Expected outcome: The correct process was selected and the time comparison is valid.
4. Inspect Load Size and Arrangement
Review whether the load is larger, denser, more complex, or differently arranged than typical loads.
Check for:
- Excessive load density
- Closely packed trays
- Unusual instrument combinations
- Packaging that restricts normal conditioning
- Chamber contact
Expected outcome: The load is appropriate for the selected cycle and arranged correctly.
5. Check for Moisture
Inspect instruments, trays, packaging, and chamber surfaces for residual moisture.
A system may spend additional time attempting to establish acceptable process conditions when a load is not fully dry.
Expected outcome: The chamber and load are visibly dry.
If correcting load moisture restores normal cycle behavior, troubleshooting can stop after successful verification.
6. Verify Door Closure and Chamber Sealing Surfaces
Inspect accessible door sealing surfaces for debris, packaging, residue, or visible damage.
Minor sealing interference may cause repeated evacuation or conditioning attempts.
Expected outcome: The door closes normally and sealing surfaces are unobstructed.
7. Review Vacuum-Related Behavior
Observe whether the longer cycle appears associated with:
- Repeated evacuation
- Extended conditioning
- Vacuum-related messages
- Unusual pumping sounds
Do not access internal vacuum components during external troubleshooting.
Expected outcome: Either normal evacuation behavior is confirmed or a probable vacuum/chamber issue is identified for escalation.
8. Check Environmental and Facility Changes
Determine whether the issue began after:
- HVAC interruption
- High room humidity
- Power disturbance
- Sterilizer relocation
- Construction
- Service work
- Changes in load-processing workflow
Expected outcome: No obvious environmental or workflow change explains the longer cycles.
9. Run a Controlled Verification Cycle
Use an appropriate approved test or verification load after correcting external causes.
Compare its operation with the reported condition.
Expected outcome: The sterilizer progresses normally through the selected cycle without repeated phases or abnormal delay.
If normal operation returns, troubleshooting can stop.
10. Escalate Persistent Process Delays
If the sterilizer repeatedly extends or repeats phases with proper loads and no obvious external cause, remove it from service for evaluation.
Possible categories include vacuum, sensing, chamber conditions, sterilant delivery, control software, or another service-level subsystem.
Expected outcome: An increasingly unreliable sterilizer is serviced before it begins aborting loads or producing uncertain process performance.
If the Problem Persists
Common external causes including cycle selection, loading, moisture, door sealing, and environment have been ruled out.
The sterilizer should be:
- Removed from service
- Labeled Out of Service
- Sent for repair or qualified service evaluation
- Evaluated using ASP documentation and approved test equipment
- Repaired or configured only by qualified personnel
Following service, verify complete cycle operation and all required process records before return to use.
Recognizing that repeated phase extension may be an early sign of a service-level problem is proper troubleshooting.
Clinical Use Tip
Use the actual cycle record and displayed phase information when investigating “slow cycle” complaints instead of relying only on staff perception of elapsed time.
Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)
CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution
Complaint
What was reported by the clinical staff.
Example:
"Sterile Processing reported that STERRAD 100NX cycles were taking longer than usual and appeared to repeat conditioning."
Cause
What was observed during troubleshooting.
Example:
"Clinical Engineering found several instruments in the reported load were still visibly damp after cleaning and drying."
Resolution
What action was taken.
Example:
"The load was removed and fully dried, and a properly prepared verification load completed normally without repeated conditioning."
Helpful Details to Include (If Known)
- Cycle selected
- Actual phase affected
- Whether cycle completed
- Exact displayed messages
- Load size and arrangement
- Moisture condition
- Door sealing condition
- Vacuum-related observations
- Environmental changes
- Comparison with verification cycle
- Final device status
Final Thought
Unexpected cycle duration should be verified before internal failure is assumed. Compare the actual process, check cycle selection, load preparation, moisture, door sealing, and vacuum-related behavior, then escalate persistent changes that cannot be explained externally.
That is successful troubleshooting.