bioMerieux VITEK 2 Compact

Probe, Pipettor, or Aspiration Error Occurs

On this page

Asset Type

Microbiology Identification System

Manufacturer

bioMerieux

Model

VITEK 2 Compact

What This Guide Helps With

Use this guide for a reported aspiration, pipetting, transfer, or similar fluid-handling error involving externally verifiable causes.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting

1. Protect Specimen Integrity

Stop processing affected patient specimens if the analyzer cannot reliably perform the required fluid-handling step.

Laboratory staff should retain or redirect specimens according to their validated workflow.

Expected outcome: No specimen is processed through an unreliable fluid-handling path.

2. Confirm the Exact Error

Determine whether the issue:

Record the displayed message exactly.

Expected outcome: The failure pattern is clearly defined before troubleshooting begins.

3. Inspect the Specimen and Container

Have laboratory personnel verify that the specimen and container meet the validated workflow.

Inspect externally for:

Do not manipulate patient specimens beyond Clinical Engineering scope.

Expected outcome: The specimen presentation does not show an obvious condition that would interfere with aspiration.

4. Inspect Racks, Holders, and Positioning

Verify the sample container is held upright and reaches its intended position without excessive movement.

Inspect racks or holders for damage, contamination, warping, or missing components.

Expected outcome: Sample containers are positioned consistently for normal processing.

5. Inspect Accessible Fluid-Handling Areas

With the system in a safe state, inspect externally accessible areas for:

Do not straighten, adjust, or disassemble an internal probe or pipetting mechanism without an authorized procedure.

Expected outcome: No external contamination or obstruction is interfering with movement or aspiration.

6. Compare With a Known-Good Sample Setup

When permitted, laboratory staff can use an appropriate known-good sample setup or control to determine whether the error follows the specimen or remains with the analyzer.

Expected outcome: The comparison helps separate specimen-related causes from an analyzer fluid-handling problem.

7. Verify Normal Initialization and System State

Confirm the analyzer has completed startup normally and has no active mechanical, positioning, loading, or fluid-handling faults.

Do not reset protected calibration or motion parameters.

Expected outcome: The analyzer is otherwise ready for operation.

8. Observe One Controlled Retry

After correcting an obvious external cause, allow one approved retry using appropriate material.

Stop repeated attempts if the same aspiration or pipetting fault immediately recurs.

Expected outcome: The fluid-handling step completes normally without recurrence.

If operation is normal and the laboratory completes required verification, troubleshooting can stop.

9. Perform Final Functional Verification

Verify normal handling of an appropriate test or control, absence of repeat fluid-handling errors, and successful laboratory verification before return to service.

Expected outcome: Fluid handling is consistent and reliable.

If the Problem Persists

If specimen presentation, containers, racks, positioning, accessible contamination, known-good comparisons, and system state have been verified, common external causes have been ruled out.

The remaining problem may involve an internal probe or pipetting mechanism, motion system, aspiration path, sensor, pump, alignment, or control condition requiring service-level evaluation.

The device should be:

Do not perform unsupported probe alignment, internal tubing work, or motion calibration. Knowing when to stop external troubleshooting is proper troubleshooting.

Complete required mechanical, analytical, and laboratory verification before return to service.

Clinical Use Tip

A recurring aspiration or pipetting problem can compromise specimen processing even when the analyzer continues operating; remove the affected function from clinical use until verified.

Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)

CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution

Complaint

What was reported by the clinical staff.

Example:
"Laboratory staff reported repeated aspiration errors while processing samples on the bioMerieux VITEK 2 Compact."

Cause

What was observed during troubleshooting.

Example:
"Clinical Engineering found a damaged sample holder that allowed the container to sit at an incorrect angle."

Resolution

What action was taken.

Example:
"Removed the damaged holder from use, verified correct positioning with an intact holder, and confirmed normal processing with laboratory verification."

Helpful Details to Include (If Known)

Final Thought

Start with specimen presentation and positioning before assuming a failed fluid-handling mechanism. Stop repeated testing when the failure persists, escalate appropriately, and document the verified correction.

That is successful troubleshooting.

Related Guides

Was this guide helpful?

Don't see a guide you need?

Suggest a Guide