CONMED System 2450 / 5000 Series

Error: Err 385 POST HVDC to 30V failed — supply too high

On this page

Asset Type

Electrosurgical Unit (ESU)

Manufacturer

CONMED

Model

System 2450 / 5000 Series

What This Guide Helps With

This guide helps troubleshoot Err 385 on the CONMED System 2450 / 5000 Series electrosurgical unit. Err 385 indicates that the unit failed the power-on self-test because the HVDC 30V supply check was too high.

This condition may point to an HVPS regulation problem, incorrect HVPS control signal, controller assembly fault, or an internal connection issue. Because this fault involves the high-voltage power supply system used for RF output control, the ESU should not be used clinically until the issue is evaluated and resolved.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting

Ensure Patient Safety First

Verify the Reported Error and Behavior

Check the Power Source First

Perform a Basic External Inspection

Power Cycle and Recheck

Configure the Unit for Test Mode

Verify HVPS Control Signals From the Controller

Verify HVPS Operation

Isolate the Failure Path

Verify Repair Before Returning to Service

If the Problem Persists

If Err 385 continues after checking the power source, power cycling the unit, inspecting the exterior, configuring test mode, checking HVPS control signals, verifying HVPS operation, and checking related internal cabling, external and common causes have been ruled out.

A persistent Err 385 strongly indicates an internal failure involving the HVPS, Controller assembly, or related internal control path.

The device should be removed from service, labeled Out of Service, and sent for repair or bench evaluation. Do not return the ESU to clinical use until repair is completed and the unit passes required performance and safety testing.

Clinical Use Tip

Never troubleshoot an ESU with an active power supply POST fault on an active patient. Move the patient to a backup device first. An unresolved HVDC fault can affect RF output control and should be treated as a patient safety concern.

Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)

CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution

Complaint

What was reported by the clinical staff.

Example:
"CONMED System 2450 / 5000 Series ESU displayed Err 385 during startup and failed to complete normal POST."

Cause

What was observed during troubleshooting.

Example:
"Confirmed Err 385 during power-on self-test. External power source and basic external condition checked. Fault indicates HVDC 30V POST level too high, with likely HVPS regulation issue, controller signal issue, or internal connection path fault."

Resolution

What action was taken.

Example:
"Power cycled unit and retested. Removed ESU from service for bench evaluation. Verified need to check HVPS control signals and HVPS operation. Unit remained out of service pending repair of Controller assembly, HVPS, or related internal cabling as indicated."

Helpful Details to Include (If Known)

Final Thought

Err 385 should be treated as a real ESU power supply control fault until proven otherwise. Start with patient safety, confirm the exact displayed error, rule out simple external causes, then isolate whether the failure is related to controller command signals, HVPS regulation, or internal connections. Clear escalation and CCR documentation protect patients, staff, and the repair process.

That is successful troubleshooting.

Related Guides

Was this guide helpful?

Don't see a guide you need?

Suggest a Guide