Drager Atlan A350

Anesthetic Agent Identification Is Missing or Incorrect

On this page

Asset Type

Anesthesia Machine

Manufacturer

Drager

Model

Atlan A350

What This Guide Helps With

Troubleshoot missing, intermittent, or incorrect anesthetic-agent identification caused by sampling, moisture, agent delivery, configuration, or gas-analysis problems.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting

1. Protect the Patient and Verify Anesthetic Delivery Independently

Do not rely on questionable agent identification while a patient is receiving anesthesia.

If the problem occurs during a case:

Do not adjust anesthetic delivery solely to make an analyzer identification appear correct.

Expected outcome: Safe anesthesia care continues using reliable monitoring while the affected system is evaluated.

Troubleshoot the Atlan A350 off-patient whenever agent identification remains unreliable.

2. Confirm the Exact Reported Behavior

Determine whether the system:

Record the actual observed display behavior and test conditions.

Expected outcome: The issue is clearly defined as missing, incorrect, delayed, or intermittent agent identification.

If correct identification is consistently demonstrated during controlled testing, document the result and stop troubleshooting.

3. Verify the Test Setup and Actual Agent in Use

Confirm with clinical staff or the controlled test setup which anesthetic agent is actually being delivered.

Check that:

Clinical Engineering should verify equipment behavior, not alter clinical dosing decisions.

Expected outcome: The expected agent in the breathing system is known and can be compared accurately with the analyzer display.

If the displayed identification matches the confirmed agent after allowing the sampling path to stabilize, no further troubleshooting is required.

4. Inspect the Gas Sampling Line

Check the external gas-sampling path for:

An impaired sample can affect multiple gas measurements, including agent identification.

Expected outcome: The gas sample reaches the analyzer through an intact, dry, open, correctly connected line.

If correcting the sampling line restores correct agent identification, proceed to final verification and stop troubleshooting.

5. Check the Gas Analyzer Water Trap

Inspect the analyzer water trap for:

Reseat or replace it with a compatible known-good trap if appropriate.

Expected outcome: The water trap is correctly installed and gas sampling occurs without obstruction or water-trap indications.

If agent recognition returns after correcting the trap, verify stable operation and stop troubleshooting.

6. Check Other Gas Measurements

Observe whether other available gas-analysis values are also missing, unstable, delayed, or implausible.

A problem affecting several measured gases suggests a broader sample-path or analyzer issue rather than isolated agent identification.

Do not use patient exposure as a troubleshooting test.

Expected outcome: Other gas measurements remain stable and respond appropriately in an approved controlled test setup.

If all gas values are abnormal, continue troubleshooting the common external sampling path before suspecting agent-specific recognition.

7. Substitute Known-Good Sampling Components

Use a known-good compatible:

Change one factor at a time where practical so the cause remains identifiable.

Expected outcome: The analyzer correctly identifies the known test agent using verified external sampling components.

If identification is restored after a substitution, replace the defective accessory and stop troubleshooting after final verification.

8. Verify Relevant User-Accessible Configuration

Review appropriate user-accessible configuration and operating selections that could affect gas-analysis presentation.

Check for:

Do not enter unauthorized service menus or change protected calibration or analyzer parameters.

Expected outcome: The system is configured to display and use gas-analysis information as intended.

If correcting an approved configuration setting restores normal agent identification, verify the complete monitoring function before return to service.

9. Compare Analyzer Response During a Controlled Functional Test

Using approved test equipment and procedures, verify that the analyzer recognizes an appropriate known gas condition.

Assess:

Do not attempt field calibration unless specifically authorized and supported by the correct service procedure and equipment.

Expected outcome: The analyzer consistently identifies the expected agent during approved testing.

If successful, proceed to final return-to-service checks.

10. Perform Final Functional Verification

Before returning the Atlan A350 to clinical service:

Expected outcome: Agent identification and the complete gas-monitoring path function normally and consistently.

If agent identification remains unreliable, do not return the anesthesia machine to service.

If the Problem Persists

If the actual agent, sampling line, water trap, external connections, operating configuration, and controlled test setup have been verified, the remaining possibilities may include an internal gas-analysis fault, analyzer calibration issue, software or configuration problem, internal sampling fault, or another service-level condition.

The device should be:

Do not perform unauthorized analyzer calibration, internal optical repair, board replacement, or service-menu adjustments. Complete all required gas-analysis, alarm, ventilation, and anesthesia-system testing after corrective service.

Escalating when agent identity cannot be verified reliably is proper troubleshooting.

Clinical Use Tip

Never use an unexpected agent-identification display as the sole basis for changing anesthetic delivery; verify the monitoring path and clinical situation independently.

Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)

CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution

Complaint

What was reported by the clinical staff.

Example:
"Anesthesia staff reported that the Atlan A350 intermittently failed to identify the anesthetic agent during setup."

Cause

What was observed during troubleshooting.

Example:
"Clinical Engineering found moisture in the external gas-sampling line causing unstable sample flow to the integrated gas analyzer."

Resolution

What action was taken.

Example:
"Replaced the contaminated sampling line, verified correct and stable agent identification with an approved functional test, and completed return-to-service checks successfully."

Helpful Details to Include (If Known)

Final Thought

Agent-identification problems should be approached as gas-monitoring problems first: protect the patient, verify the actual test condition, inspect the sample path, and rule out consumables and configuration before assuming analyzer failure. Escalate any unresolved or unreliable result and document the verified cause and final testing.

That is successful troubleshooting.

Related Guides

Was this guide helpful?

Don't see a guide you need?

Suggest a Guide