Mindray Resona I9

Image Quality Is Poor or Artifacts Are Present

On this page

Asset Type

Ultrasound System

Manufacturer

Mindray

Model

Resona I9

What This Guide Helps With

Use for unexpected noise, dropout, nonuniformity, distortion, intermittent artifacts, or image quality that is inadequate for reliable clinical use.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting

1. Protect Diagnostic Accuracy

Do not continue a diagnostic examination when image quality is unreliable or an unexplained artifact could affect interpretation. Move the examination to another verified ultrasound system when necessary.

Expected outcome: Clinical decisions are based on reliable imaging rather than a questionable image.

2. Confirm and Characterize the Artifact

Ask staff which probe, examination, imaging mode, and circumstances produced the problem. Determine whether the artifact is constant, intermittent, localized, probe-dependent, position-dependent, or present with multiple probes.

Expected outcome: The artifact is reproducible enough to guide troubleshooting or useful details are captured for escalation.

3. Inspect the Transducer

Clean the probe according to approved infection-control procedures and inspect the acoustic surface, housing, cable, strain relief, and connector for contamination, damage, cracking, cuts, or impact evidence.

Expected outcome: The probe is clean and externally intact. Any visibly damaged probe is removed from service.

4. Verify Probe Connection

Confirm the transducer connector is correctly seated and secured. Observe whether gently repositioning external cable routing changes the artifact without flexing or stressing the cable.

Expected outcome: A secure connection provides a stable image without intermittent dropout.

5. Check Coupling and Test Conditions

For appropriate bench evaluation, use an approved test object, phantom, or suitable controlled test condition. Ensure adequate acoustic coupling and eliminate obvious air gaps or poor test setup before judging system performance.

Expected outcome: Image quality can be assessed under repeatable conditions.

6. Review User-Accessible Imaging Controls

Check whether gain, depth, focus, frequency selection, dynamic range, processing, or other standard imaging controls have been set unusually for the examination. Compare with an appropriate known working preset rather than changing protected configuration.

Expected outcome: Image quality is normal with reasonable clinical settings. If the issue was caused by an incorrect user-accessible setting, verify the correction and troubleshooting can stop.

7. Test a Known-Good Compatible Probe

Use another compatible known-good transducer under the same controlled imaging conditions.

Expected outcome: If the artifact disappears with the known-good probe, the original probe is isolated as the affected accessory and should be removed from service. If the artifact remains, continue system-level checks.

8. Check the Environment

Look for newly installed electrical equipment, damaged power connections, unusual electromagnetic interference sources, or room-specific conditions if the artifact occurs only in one location.

Expected outcome: No external environmental condition is contributing to the image artifact.

9. Compare Imaging Modes

Without changing protected settings, determine whether the artifact is present in basic live imaging and whether it appears across multiple compatible probes or modes.

Expected outcome: The issue is isolated to a probe, operating condition, or broader system imaging path.

10. Perform Final Functional Verification

After correction, obtain repeatable images under controlled conditions and verify there is no unexpected dropout, noise, distortion, or artifact. Verify any affected probe separately before return to clinical use.

Expected outcome: Image quality is stable and clinically usable. If successful, troubleshooting can stop.

If the Problem Persists

Probe condition, coupling, connection, user-accessible controls, known-good substitution, and environmental causes have been evaluated. Persistent artifacts may involve transducer-element failure, acquisition electronics, image-processing hardware or software, calibration, configuration, or another internal service-level issue.

Remove the affected probe or system from service as appropriate, label it Out of Service, and arrange repair or bench evaluation using appropriate Mindray documentation, approved test equipment, and suitable ultrasound test objects.

Return the equipment to service only after the reported artifact has been eliminated and applicable image-quality verification has been successfully completed.

Knowing when to stop external troubleshooting and escalate is proper troubleshooting.

Clinical Use Tip

An image artifact that cannot be confidently explained should be treated as a diagnostic reliability issue, not merely a cosmetic display problem.

Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)

CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution

Complaint

What was reported by the clinical staff.

Example:
"Clinical staff reported intermittent image dropout on the Resona I9 during examinations with one transducer."

Cause

What was observed during troubleshooting.

Example:
"Clinical Engineering reproduced the dropout with the reported probe while a compatible known-good probe produced a stable image."

Resolution

What action was taken.

Example:
"Clinical Engineering removed the affected transducer from service, verified normal imaging with the known-good probe, and returned the ultrasound system to service with the defective probe excluded."

Helpful Details to Include (If Known)

Final Thought

Protect diagnostic accuracy, reproduce the artifact under controlled conditions, inspect and compare probes before assuming system failure, verify image quality after correction, escalate unresolved faults, and document the evidence clearly.

That is successful troubleshooting.

Related Guides

Was this guide helpful?

Don't see a guide you need?

Suggest a Guide