Mindray WATO EX Series

Network, Data Export, or Central Monitoring Communication Failure

On this page

Asset Type

Anesthesia Machine

Manufacturer

Mindray

Model

WATO EX Series

What This Guide Helps With

Troubleshooting missing network connectivity, failed data export, or unavailable central monitoring caused by cables, ports, configuration, network, or receiving-system problems.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting

1. Ensure Patient Safety First

Do not perform extended network troubleshooting while the WATO EX Series machine is supporting an active patient.

If communication fails during a procedure:

Expected outcome: Patient care remains supported by local equipment and does not depend on the failed network connection.

Continue troubleshooting only when the machine can be evaluated without disrupting patient care.

2. Identify the Exact Communication Failure

Determine which function is affected:

Record the complete message, affected destination, and time of failure.

Expected outcome: The failure is narrowed to the anesthesia machine, network pathway, or receiving system.

3. Confirm Local Machine Operation

Verify that the WATO EX Series machine:

A network failure alone should not be treated as evidence that ventilation or gas delivery has failed.

Expected outcome: Local clinical functions operate normally, isolating the problem to communication or data transfer.

4. Inspect the Network Cable and Connection

Inspect the Ethernet cable from the anesthesia machine to the wall jack, network switch, interface device, or integration gateway.

Check for:

Disconnect and firmly reseat both ends when safe.

Expected outcome: The cable is secure and physically undamaged. If communication returns, verify stable operation and stop.

5. Check Network Port Indicators

Observe the link and activity indicators at the anesthesia machine, wall interface, switch, or approved network adapter when visible.

Do not interpret indicator behavior as proof that clinical data is reaching its destination.

Expected outcome: Physical network-link status is documented.

6. Test With a Known-Good Approved Network Cable

Replace the existing Ethernet cable with a known-good cable of the correct type and rating.

Do not permanently exchange cables between active patient-care devices without maintaining proper identification and infection-control practices.

Expected outcome: If communication returns, replace the defective cable, confirm reliable data transfer, and stop.

7. Verify the Network Jack or Switch Port

When permitted by facility policy:

Do not connect the anesthesia machine to an unapproved or general-purpose network.

Expected outcome: The physical network pathway is confirmed active and correctly assigned.

8. Verify Communication and Network Settings

Review accessible communication settings without changing values unless the correct configuration is documented.

Confirm, as applicable:

Settings and available interfaces can vary among WATO EX models, software revisions, and installed options.

Expected outcome: Configuration matches the hospital’s approved integration documentation.

9. Check for Duplicate or Incorrect Network Identity

Compare the machine’s approved network information with Clinical Engineering or Information Technology records.

Look for:

Do not randomly assign a new address.

Expected outcome: The machine has a unique and approved network identity.

10. Confirm Patient, Bed, and Central-Station Assignment

Verify that:

A working network connection can still appear unsuccessful when the device is assigned incorrectly.

Expected outcome: Device, patient, and location assignments agree across connected systems.

11. Check the Receiving System

Determine whether other networked devices are communicating with the same:

If several devices are affected, the failure is more likely outside the WATO EX Series machine.

Expected outcome: The problem is isolated to one anesthesia machine or identified as a broader network or server issue.

12. Check Interface Equipment and Gateways

Inspect any approved interface device between the anesthesia machine and the destination system.

Verify:

Do not reset shared gateways or interface servers without coordinating with Information Technology and affected clinical departments.

Expected outcome: External interface equipment is operational or identified as the source of the failure.

13. Perform a Controlled Restart When Appropriate

After the machine is removed from patient use and clinical data has been preserved:

Do not repeatedly power-cycle the machine.

Expected outcome: Communication initializes normally. If the connection returns, verify data at the receiving system and stop.

14. Verify Communication With a Controlled Test

Use a simulator or approved test setup to generate recognizable nonpatient data.

Confirm that:

Mindray identifies the WATO EX-65 as compatible with its BeneVision central monitoring environment, but actual communication capabilities depend on installed options and facility integration.

Expected outcome: End-to-end communication is confirmed before the machine is returned to service.

If the Problem Persists

If the network cable, wall jack, port status, configuration, device identity, receiving system, and external interfaces have been checked, common external causes have been ruled out.

The problem may involve:

The device should be:

Do not perform board-level repair or undocumented software changes. Knowing when to stop and escalate is proper troubleshooting.

Clinical Use Tip

A failed central-monitoring or data-export connection does not eliminate the need for continuous local monitoring. Never troubleshoot communication at the expense of ventilation, gas delivery, alarms, or patient observation. Do not troubleshoot on an active patient. Move the patient to a verified backup device first when therapy continuity or required monitoring could be affected.

Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)

CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution

Complaint

What was reported by the clinical staff.

Example:
"Anesthesia staff reported that the WATO EX Series machine was not transmitting patient parameters to the central monitoring station."

Cause

What was observed during troubleshooting.

Example:
"Found a damaged Ethernet cable with no network link indication between the anesthesia machine and the assigned wall jack."

Resolution

What action was taken.

Example:
"Replaced the cable with an approved known-good cable, confirmed stable network link, and verified simulated parameters at the correct central station before returning the machine to service."

Helpful Details to Include (If Known)

Final Thought

Communication failures should be approached by protecting the patient, confirming local machine operation, and checking the physical connection before changing configuration. Clear documentation and proper coordination with Information Technology or the integration vendor prevent unnecessary parts replacement and repeated failures.

That is successful troubleshooting.

Related Guides

Was this guide helpful?

Don't see a guide you need?

Suggest a Guide