Philips Zenition Series

Poor Image Quality, Excessive Noise, or Artifact

On this page

Asset Type

C-Arm

Manufacturer

Philips

Model

Zenition Series

What This Guide Helps With

Addresses degraded images caused by positioning, obstructions, accessories, detector contamination, technique selection, environmental interference, or external equipment.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting

1. Protect the Patient and Confirm the Complaint Without Unnecessary Exposure

If image quality is inadequate for safe clinical interpretation, stop relying on the system and provide alternate verified imaging as needed. Obtain clinical examples or descriptions of the problem rather than repeatedly exposing a patient.

Determine whether the complaint is noise, lines, shading, distortion, dropout, blur, or another visible artifact.

Expected outcome: The image-quality issue is defined without unnecessary radiation exposure.

2. Inspect the Imaging Path

Check the detector surface, X-ray source area, and space between them for removable objects, covers, positioning aids, cables, instruments, table components, or foreign material that may be entering the field.

Do not remove required sterile barriers during an active procedure unless clinical workflow permits.

Expected outcome: The imaging path is clear of unintended objects.

If removing an unintended obstruction eliminates the artifact, proceed to final verification.

3. Inspect the Detector Surface and External Components

With the unit out of active patient use, inspect accessible detector surfaces and covers for contamination, residue, damage, or attached material. Clean only using approved methods and products.

Expected outcome: External imaging surfaces are clean, intact, and free of visible contamination.

If approved cleaning resolves the artifact, continue to final verification.

4. Verify Positioning and Geometry

Confirm the C-arm, detector, patient support, and test object are positioned appropriately for the intended imaging task. Check for excessive object-to-detector separation, unintended angulation, movement, or equipment entering the field.

Expected outcome: Imaging geometry and positioning are appropriate for the test being performed.

If corrected positioning restores acceptable image quality, troubleshooting can stop after verification.

5. Review User-Accessible Imaging Settings

Verify the selected clinical imaging mode and user-accessible technique selections are appropriate for the intended application. Compare with a known-good workflow or equivalent system if necessary.

Do not alter service calibration values or restricted configuration.

Expected outcome: Normal user-accessible settings are selected for the imaging task.

If an incorrect selection caused the issue and image quality returns to normal after correction, proceed to verification.

6. Check for Motion or Mechanical Instability

Observe whether the image-quality problem appears only during C-arm movement, table movement, or vibration. Confirm brakes are holding as expected and that equipment near the system is not physically contacting it.

Expected outcome: The imaging system and test object remain mechanically stable during acquisition.

If eliminating motion removes blur or artifact, verify stability and stop troubleshooting.

7. Remove Potential External Interference

Temporarily move or power down nonessential nearby equipment when operationally safe if the artifact appears related to environmental electrical interference. Ensure external cables are routed correctly and not damaged.

Expected outcome: The artifact either disappears when an external source is removed or remains independent of the environment.

8. Compare Images Using a Suitable Test Object

With the patient removed from the troubleshooting process, obtain images of an approved test object according to facility and Philips procedures. Determine whether the artifact is reproducible at the same detector location or under the same conditions.

Expected outcome: The image-quality problem is either resolved or objectively reproducible for escalation.

9. Check Image Display Versus Acquisition

When possible, determine whether the artifact appears on acquired images themselves or only on a particular display. Compare the mobile viewing station displays or another approved review destination when available.

Expected outcome: The problem is isolated to image acquisition or display rather than assumed to involve the entire imaging chain.

10. Perform Final Functional Verification

Verify acceptable image quality using approved test methods, ensure no persistent artifact is visible, confirm detector readiness, and verify normal operation across representative permitted positions.

Expected outcome: Images are clinically usable and no abnormal noise or artifact remains during controlled testing.

If successful, troubleshooting can stop and the unit may be returned to service.

11. Escalate Persistent Image Degradation

If poor image quality remains reproducible after external obstruction, contamination, positioning, settings, motion, and environmental causes are ruled out, stop external troubleshooting.

Expected outcome: The device remains out of clinical use until the imaging chain is evaluated by qualified service personnel.

If the Problem Persists

Common external and workflow-related causes have been ruled out. The remaining issue may involve detector performance, image-processing configuration, calibration, X-ray generation, display performance, or another service-level imaging subsystem problem.

The device should be:

Do not perform undocumented calibration or internal detector repair. Complete appropriate image-quality and radiation-performance testing before return to service.

Knowing when to stop external troubleshooting is proper troubleshooting.

Clinical Use Tip

Use an approved test object rather than a patient when reproducing image-quality problems whenever possible.

Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)

CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution

Complaint

What was reported by the clinical staff.

Example:
"Clinical staff reported a persistent shadow artifact on images from the Philips Zenition Series."

Cause

What was observed during troubleshooting.

Example:
"Clinical Engineering found residue on the external detector cover within the imaging field."

Resolution

What action was taken.

Example:
"The detector cover was cleaned using the approved method, test-object imaging showed the artifact was eliminated, and normal image quality was verified."

Helpful Details to Include (If Known)

Final Thought

Image-quality complaints should be reproduced safely and objectively. Clear the imaging path, verify positioning and settings, inspect external surfaces, and rule out motion or environmental causes before escalating suspected detector or imaging-system problems.

That is successful troubleshooting.

Related Guides

Was this guide helpful?

Don't see a guide you need?

Suggest a Guide