Roche cobas pro

Quality-Control Results Are Out of Range

On this page

Asset Type

Clinical Chemistry Analyzer

Manufacturer

Roche

Model

cobas pro

What This Guide Helps With

Troubleshoots out-of-range QC by separating control-material, reagent, calibration, handling, environmental, and analyzer-performance causes before service escalation.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting

1. Protect Patient Results and Confirm the QC Failure

Do not release affected patient results contrary to laboratory policy when QC is unacceptable.

Confirm:

Clinical Engineering should preserve the distinction between analyzer troubleshooting and the laboratory's clinical interpretation of QC.

Expected outcome: Affected testing is identified and appropriately held while the failure is investigated.

2. Confirm Analyzer Status

Check for active analyzer faults involving:

Resolve any legitimate analyzer readiness fault before interpreting repeated QC attempts.

Expected outcome: No unresolved analyzer alarm explains the QC failure.

3. Have Laboratory Staff Verify QC Material

Authorized laboratory personnel should confirm:

Do not independently override laboratory QC handling requirements.

Expected outcome: QC material handling is verified before analyzer failure is suspected.

4. Verify Reagent and Calibration Status

Confirm the affected assay's reagent is recognized and that required calibration status is acceptable.

Look for recent:

Document these factors for laboratory review.

Expected outcome: Reagent and calibration conditions are known and consistent with normal testing.

5. Check Sample Presentation and Aspiration Conditions

Inspect the QC tube and carrier for:

Expected outcome: QC material can be aspirated normally without an obvious physical sampling problem.

6. Repeat QC Only After Appropriate Review

If laboratory policy supports repeating QC, use freshly prepared or verified QC material when appropriate and avoid repeated reruns without investigating the underlying cause.

Compare whether the result:

Expected outcome: A handling-related or transient issue is either corrected or ruled out.

7. Determine Whether the Pattern Is Assay-Specific

Compare unaffected assays and other QC levels.

A single-assay problem may involve assay-specific:

Broad QC shifts may suggest:

Expected outcome: The scope of the QC issue is defined without claiming a failed internal component.

8. Inspect External Environmental and Supply Conditions

Verify:

Expected outcome: No external environmental or supply condition explains the abnormal QC.

9. Perform Final Verification

When the identified cause has been corrected:

Expected outcome: Required QC is acceptable and the laboratory authorizes return to patient testing. Troubleshooting is complete.

10. Escalate Persistent QC Failure

If QC remains unacceptable after verified controls, reagent status, calibration, sample presentation, supplies, and environment are checked, stop external troubleshooting.

Expected outcome: Affected testing remains suspended and the analyzer is escalated for qualified evaluation.

If the Problem Persists

External and laboratory-process causes have been reviewed. Persistent QC failure may involve pipetting accuracy, fluidics, optical or measurement systems, temperature regulation, wash performance, calibration/configuration, or another service-level condition.

The affected analyzer or module should be:

Required calibration and QC must be successfully completed before patient testing resumes.

Knowing when to stop external troubleshooting and escalate is proper troubleshooting.

Clinical Use Tip

Treat abnormal QC as a result-integrity problem, not merely an analyzer alarm; patient results remain dependent on laboratory QC acceptance.

Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)

CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution

Complaint

What was reported by the clinical staff.

Example:
"Laboratory staff reported QC for one chemistry assay shifted out of the laboratory's acceptable range."

Cause

What was observed during troubleshooting.

Example:
"Clinical Engineering and laboratory staff found the QC tube contained visible bubbles that interfered with consistent aspiration."

Resolution

What action was taken.

Example:
"Laboratory staff prepared a verified replacement QC sample, Clinical Engineering confirmed normal aspiration, and repeat QC met laboratory acceptance criteria."

Helpful Details to Include (If Known)

Final Thought

Out-of-range QC requires protection of result integrity first. Verify control material, reagent, calibration, sampling, and external conditions before assuming internal failure, and return testing only after laboratory acceptance.

That is successful troubleshooting.

Related Guides

Was this guide helpful?

Don't see a guide you need?

Suggest a Guide