Siemens Healthineers Atellica IM 1600

Probe, Pipettor, or Aspiration Error Occurs

On this page

Asset Type

Immunoassay Analyzer

Manufacturer

Siemens Healthineers

Model

Atellica IM 1600

What This Guide Helps With

Use this guide for repeated aspiration, probe, or pipetting errors that prevent reliable sample, reagent, calibrator, or control handling.

Step-by-Step Troubleshooting

1. Protect Patient Samples and Stop Unreliable Testing

Stop affected testing if the analyzer cannot reliably aspirate samples or reagents.

Determine whether the condition affects:

Document the exact displayed condition and whether the event is intermittent or repeatable.

Expected outcome: The scope of the aspiration problem is established and affected patient testing is stopped. If an external cause is corrected and reliable aspiration is demonstrated, troubleshooting can stop.

2. Inspect the Affected Sample or Material

Inspect the involved tube, cup, or reagent container for:

Do not insert tools into patient specimens or otherwise compromise specimen integrity.

Expected outcome: The material is suitable for normal aspiration. If replacing or repositioning the container resolves the error, the issue is resolved.

3. Compare With a Known-Good Container or Material

Use appropriate laboratory-approved material to determine whether the error follows:

Expected outcome: The error is narrowed to the sample/material or to the analyzer. If a known-good substitute aspirates normally, address the external sample or container issue and stop troubleshooting after verification.

4. Inspect Accessible Probe Area

When the analyzer is in a safe state and access is permitted, visually inspect accessible probe or pipetting areas for:

Do not manually bend, straighten, realign, or disassemble probes.

Expected outcome: No visible external obstruction or damage is present. Visible probe damage requires immediate removal from service and escalation.

5. Verify Sample and Rack Positioning

Confirm sample racks, carriers, and containers are correctly seated and not placing tubes outside their expected aspiration position.

Check whether the error repeatedly occurs at one location.

Expected outcome: Samples are consistently positioned beneath the normal aspiration path. If correcting rack or tube placement resolves the error, troubleshooting can stop.

6. Check for Clot, Bubble, or Fluidic Conditions

Review whether the analyzer is also reporting:

A probe error may be secondary to another external fluid-handling condition.

Expected outcome: No unresolved fluidic prerequisite is interfering with aspiration. If correcting an external fluidic condition restores operation, proceed to functional verification.

7. Perform Approved External Cleaning if Indicated

If contamination is visible and routine operator/maintenance documentation permits external cleaning, perform only the approved accessible cleaning procedure.

Do not insert wires, probes, or unapproved tools into fluid pathways.

Expected outcome: Accessible contamination is removed and the analyzer resumes normal aspiration. If the error persists, do not continue invasive cleaning.

8. Verify With Nonpatient Material

Run appropriate nonpatient material through the affected path.

Observe whether:

Expected outcome: Reliable aspiration and processing are demonstrated. Troubleshooting can stop after required QC or readiness checks.

9. Escalate Recurrent Probe or Pipetting Faults

If the error occurs with known-good material and proper positioning, or visible probe damage is present, remove the analyzer from affected testing.

Do not attempt internal probe replacement, alignment, pipettor calibration, or internal tubing repair unless trained and authorized.

Expected outcome: The unresolved mechanical or fluidic problem is safely escalated.

If the Problem Persists

If sample volume, container condition, positioning, visible contamination, racks, reagents, and other external fluidic factors have been verified, common external causes have been ruled out.

Remaining possibilities include internal probe damage, pipettor positioning, pressure or aspiration sensing, tubing or valve problems, internal obstruction, or another service-level condition.

The analyzer should be:

After repair, verify aspiration performance, analyzer function, and required QC before patient testing resumes.

Knowing when to stop external troubleshooting is proper troubleshooting.

Clinical Use Tip

Do not keep rerunning irreplaceable patient specimens through an analyzer with repeated aspiration errors; preserve the sample and use an alternate validated method when needed.

Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)

CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution

Complaint

What was reported by the clinical staff.

Example:
"Laboratory staff reported repeated aspiration errors while the Atellica IM 1600 attempted to process samples from one rack."

Cause

What was observed during troubleshooting.

Example:
"Clinical Engineering found one sample tube was not fully seated and was positioned incorrectly for normal probe access."

Resolution

What action was taken.

Example:
"The tube was correctly positioned, a nonpatient sample processed without aspiration error, and required analyzer verification was completed before return to use."

Helpful Details to Include (If Known)

Final Thought

Probe and aspiration errors should first be traced through the sample, container, volume, positioning, and visible contamination. Avoid invasive probe work, protect patient specimens, and escalate repeatable mechanical or fluidic faults appropriately.

That is successful troubleshooting.

Related Guides

Was this guide helpful?

Don't see a guide you need?

Suggest a Guide