On this page
Asset Type
Manufacturer
Model
What This Guide Helps With
Troubleshooting calibration, QC, assay recovery, and LIS communication failures using safe external and workflow checks before repair escalation.
Step-by-Step Troubleshooting
Ensure Patient Safety First
Confirm whether the Dimension EXL 200 is actively processing patient specimens.
If calibration, QC, assay recovery, or LIS communication is failing, affected assays should not be used for patient result reporting until acceptable QC and communication status are confirmed.
Expected outcome: Patient results are protected from being released from an analyzer or interface that is not functioning correctly.
Confirm the Exact Reported Failure
Ask the laboratory staff what failed and when it started.
Determine whether the issue involves:
- Calibration failure
- QC failure
- Poor assay recovery
- One specific assay failing
- Multiple assays failing
- Results not transmitting to LIS
- Orders not downloading from LIS
- Results stuck, rejected, or delayed
- Recent reagent, calibrator, QC lot, software, middleware, or network change
Expected outcome: The issue is separated into analytical failure, reagent/QC workflow issue, or communication issue.
Check Analyzer Status and Error Messages
Review the Dimension EXL 200 operator screen, status indicators, and any active alarms or messages.
Look for messages related to reagent status, sample handling, calibration, QC, system readiness, host communication, or pending results.
Expected outcome: The analyzer provides a specific fault area instead of troubleshooting the entire system broadly.
Verify the Analyzer Is Ready and Not in a Hold, Error, or Offline State
Confirm that the analyzer is online, initialized, and available for testing.
If the system is paused, stopped, in standby, or showing a condition that prevents processing, follow approved operator recovery steps before repeating calibration, QC, or communication testing.
Expected outcome: Testing or result transmission is not blocked by a basic analyzer state issue.
Check Reagent Status for Affected Assays
Verify that the required reagent cartridges or onboard reagents are present, recognized, properly seated, and not expired.
Confirm sufficient reagent volume and that the reagent lot matches the expected calibration and QC setup.
Expected outcome: Calibration or QC is not failing because of missing, expired, depleted, or mismatched reagent.
Check Calibrator and QC Material
Confirm that the correct calibrator or QC material was used for the affected assay.
Check expiration date, lot number, storage condition, reconstitution requirements, mixing, and whether the material was allowed to reach proper handling condition per lab procedure.
Expected outcome: The failure is not caused by incorrect or compromised calibration/QC material.
Confirm Lot and Assay Setup
Review whether there was a recent reagent lot change, calibrator lot change, QC lot change, assay parameter update, or laboratory middleware change.
A mismatch between reagent, calibrator, QC, and assay setup can cause repeated calibration or QC failures even when the analyzer hardware is functioning normally.
Expected outcome: Lot-related or setup-related causes are identified before hardware failure is suspected.
Repeat Calibration or QC Only When the External Cause Has Been Addressed
If an obvious issue was found, such as expired QC, wrong lot selection, empty reagent, or improperly prepared material, correct that issue first.
Then have the lab repeat calibration or QC according to site procedure.
Expected outcome: Calibration or QC passes after correcting the external or workflow-related cause. If resolved, document the work order and stop.
Check for Sample or Assay Recovery Pattern
If the complaint is poor assay recovery, determine whether it affects:
- One patient sample
- One assay
- One reagent lot
- One QC level
- Multiple assays
- All chemistry testing
Expected outcome: A single-sample or single-assay issue is separated from a broader analyzer performance issue.
Inspect External Fluid, Waste, and Consumable Conditions
Confirm that required fluids, wash solutions, cuvettes, sample cups, and waste containers or drains are available and not creating system interruptions.
Look for visible leaks, kinked external lines, full waste containers, empty fluid containers, unusual odors, or fluid around the analyzer.
Expected outcome: Analytical performance is not being affected by a basic fluidics, consumable, or waste condition.
Check Environmental and Power Conditions
Verify that the analyzer is connected to the correct power source and that no recent power event occurred.
Confirm that the analyzer area has not experienced excessive heat, vibration, water exposure, construction dust, or relocation.
Expected outcome: External site conditions are ruled out as contributors to unstable calibration, QC drift, or communication interruption.
For LIS Communication Failure, Confirm the Scope
Ask the lab whether the issue affects only the Dimension EXL 200 or multiple analyzers.
If multiple analyzers are affected, involve LIS, middleware, or IT support early because the issue may be outside the analyzer.
Expected outcome: The problem is identified as analyzer-specific or part of a broader network/LIS event.
Check Network Cable and Physical Connection
Inspect the Ethernet cable at the analyzer and wall/network port.
Confirm the cable is firmly seated and not damaged. If permitted by site policy, try a known-good network cable and known-good network jack.
Expected outcome: LIS communication is not failing due to a loose cable, damaged cable, or inactive wall port.
Confirm Host or LIS Connection Status
Review the analyzer’s host communication status, if available, and check whether the analyzer is online to the host.
Confirm whether orders are downloading, results are transmitting, or only one direction of communication is failing.
Expected outcome: The communication failure is narrowed to order download, result upload, bidirectional interface, middleware, or LIS-side issue.
Check for Pending, Held, or Rejected Results
Review whether results are stuck in a queue, held for review, rejected, or waiting for manual release.
Not every LIS complaint is a network failure. Some are caused by result review rules, patient/order mismatch, sample ID mismatch, or middleware rejection.
Expected outcome: Workflow and order-matching problems are ruled out before calling the analyzer interface failed.
Coordinate With LIS or IT for Network Verification
If the analyzer appears functional but communication still fails, contact LIS/IT to verify network port status, IP address, interface engine status, middleware status, and recent changes.
Clinical Engineering should confirm the device-side physical connection and analyzer status, while LIS/IT confirms host-side communication.
Expected outcome: Device-side and network-side responsibilities are separated clearly.
Restart Only When Safe and Approved
If the analyzer or workstation appears locked, unresponsive, or communication has stopped, coordinate with the lab before restarting any analyzer, workstation, or interface component.
Do not interrupt active testing unless the lab approves and patient testing impact has been addressed.
Expected outcome: Recovery actions do not compromise active specimens or patient result integrity.
Perform a Controlled Verification
After correcting the issue, have the lab verify successful operation using the appropriate site-approved method.
This may include acceptable calibration, passing QC, successful assay recovery review, successful order download, or successful result transmission to LIS.
Expected outcome: The analyzer is returned to service only after the reported failure is verified as resolved.
If the Problem Persists
If calibration, QC, assay recovery, or LIS communication problems continue after external checks, reagent/QC review, consumable checks, analyzer status review, and LIS/network coordination, common external causes have been ruled out.
The Dimension EXL 200 should be:
- Removed from service for affected testing
- Labeled Out of Service if patient testing may be impacted
- Sent for repair, vendor service, or bench-level evaluation as appropriate
- Escalated to LIS/IT if the failure is confirmed to be outside the analyzer
Knowing when to stop is proper troubleshooting. Continued repeated calibration or QC attempts without identifying the cause can waste materials and delay patient testing.
Clinical Use Tip
Do not troubleshoot calibration, QC, assay recovery, or LIS communication issues in a way that risks releasing questionable patient results. If patient testing is urgent, have the lab move specimens to an approved backup analyzer or downtime process before extended troubleshooting begins.
Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)
CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution
Complaint
What was reported by the clinical staff.
Example:
"Laboratory reported the Dimension EXL 200 failed QC on multiple chemistry assays and patient results were not transmitting consistently to LIS."
Cause
What was observed during troubleshooting.
Example:
"Found affected reagent and QC lots were valid, analyzer was ready, network cable was secure, and LIS confirmed intermittent host interface communication errors."
Resolution
What action was taken.
Example:
"Verified analyzer-side connections and status, coordinated LIS interface review, confirmed successful QC and result transmission after host communication was restored, and returned unit to service."
Helpful Details to Include (If Known)
- Exact calibration, QC, assay recovery, or LIS complaint
- Assays affected
- Whether one assay or multiple assays were involved
- Reagent lot and expiration checked
- Calibrator lot and expiration checked
- QC lot and expiration checked
- Recent reagent, QC, calibrator, or software changes
- Analyzer status and error messages
- Whether orders downloaded successfully
- Whether results transmitted successfully
- Network cable and wall jack checked
- LIS/IT ticket or contact name
- Any unusual sounds, leaks, heat, odor, or visible damage
- Alarm behavior
- Accessories swapped
- Power behavior
- Environmental factors
- Indicator lights
- Final device status
Final Thought
For the Dimension EXL 200, calibration, QC, assay recovery, and LIS failures should be approached logically. Protect patient results first, then verify reagents, QC materials, analyzer status, consumables, and communication paths. Escalate when external causes have been ruled out, and document the complaint, cause, and resolution clearly.
That is successful troubleshooting.