On this page
Asset Type
Manufacturer
Model
What This Guide Helps With
Troubleshooting elevated background counts, possible flow cell contamination, debris, carryover, or abnormal particle counts on the Sysmex UF-1000i.
Step-by-Step Troubleshooting
Ensure Patient Safety First
Confirm the UF-1000i is not actively processing patient specimens before stopping operation, running cleaning, checking reagents, or inspecting fluid areas.
Expected outcome: No patient specimen is interrupted, lost, or resulted from a device with a suspected contamination issue.
Stop Reporting Questionable Results
Ask laboratory staff whether abnormal background counts, unexpected particles, or carryover concerns affected patient specimens.
Confirm whether affected results were held, repeated, reviewed, or verified according to laboratory policy.
Expected outcome: Questionable urine particle results are not released without appropriate review.
Confirm the Exact Background Complaint
Ask staff what they observed. Determine whether the issue involves:
- Elevated background count
- Flow cell contamination message
- Abnormal scattergram background
- Debris or particles with blank/sample checks
- Failed background check
- Carryover after abnormal specimens
- QC failure related to elevated counts
- Repeated rinse or cleaning prompts
Expected outcome: The issue is separated into contamination, carryover, reagent, QC, or sample-related concerns.
Check for Recent Problem Specimens
Ask whether the issue began after highly turbid urine, heavy sediment, blood, mucus, bacteria, crystals, or unusually concentrated specimens.
If so, have the lab follow their approved repeat, dilution, manual review, or rerun policy.
Expected outcome: A difficult specimen is identified as a possible source of contamination or carryover.
Verify Reagent and Sheath Fluid Status
Check that all required Sysmex-approved fluids are present, properly installed, not expired, and not empty.
Confirm containers are not collapsed, contaminated, incorrectly connected, or left open.
Expected outcome: Background issues are not being caused by improper fluid supply or contaminated reagent handling.
Check Waste Container or Drain Condition
Confirm the waste container is not full and that the waste line is not kinked, pinched, blocked, or improperly positioned.
Poor waste removal can affect fluid movement and rinse effectiveness.
Expected outcome: Waste can drain normally during rinse and cleaning cycles.
Inspect External Tubing and Fluid Lines
Visually inspect user-accessible tubing for air bubbles, kinks, dried residue, loose fittings, leaks, or discoloration.
Do not disconnect internal tubing unless trained and authorized.
Expected outcome: External fluid path issues are either corrected or ruled out.
Confirm Proper Sample Tube and Rack Handling
Check whether sample tubes are compatible, filled appropriately, mixed correctly, and seated properly in the rack.
Poor sample preparation can introduce clots, sediment buildup, foam, or carryover risk.
Expected outcome: Sample handling problems are ruled out before assuming analyzer failure.
Review Error History and Background Trend
Check the analyzer or IPU/workstation for recent background errors, clog warnings, rinse failures, reagent warnings, or QC failures.
Look for repeated events rather than a single isolated failure.
Expected outcome: The issue is confirmed as recurring, intermittent, or isolated.
Run the Operator-Accessible Rinse or Background Check
Use the normal user-accessible maintenance or background check process approved by the laboratory and facility procedure.
Do not bypass required quality checks.
Expected outcome: Background count returns to acceptable range, or the failure repeats.
If this resolves the issue, document the cleaning/rinse action and stop.
Run Approved Cleaning Maintenance
If the background remains elevated, have authorized staff perform the approved cleaning cycle using the correct Sysmex cleaning solution and procedure.
Avoid improvised cleaners or unapproved fluids, as they may damage the flow cell or fluid path.
Expected outcome: Contamination clears and background count returns to acceptable limits.
If this resolves the issue, confirm acceptable QC or background results before returning the analyzer to service.
Check for Carryover After Cleaning
After cleaning, confirm with the laboratory that background checks, blanks, QC, or repeat samples are acceptable according to their policy.
Expected outcome: The analyzer demonstrates stable background performance before patient testing resumes.
Verify QC Performance
Ask the lab to confirm QC acceptability after cleaning and background correction.
If QC remains abnormal despite acceptable external checks and cleaning, do not return the unit to routine use.
Expected outcome: The device is either verified for use or identified for escalation.
Check IPU/Workstation Displayed Flags
Review whether the abnormality is being reported by the analyzer, IPU, QC program, or middleware.
This helps separate true analyzer background contamination from software interpretation or result handling issues.
Expected outcome: The source of the background concern is better isolated.
Do Not Continue Repeated Cleaning Indefinitely
If multiple approved cleanings do not correct the background count, stop troubleshooting.
Repeated cleaning without improvement may delay testing and can mask a deeper fluidic, flow cell, detector, or contamination issue.
Expected outcome: The device is escalated appropriately instead of being repeatedly cycled without resolution.
If the Problem Persists
If the UF-1000i continues to show elevated background counts, abnormal scattergrams, contamination messages, failed background checks, or QC failure after external fluid, waste, sample handling, reagent, and approved cleaning steps have been completed, common external causes have been ruled out.
The analyzer should be:
- Removed from service
- Labeled Out of Service
- Sent for repair or bench evaluation
- Escalated to Sysmex service or qualified repair support
The likely remaining causes may include internal fluid path contamination, persistent flow cell contamination, rinse system failure, valve/pump issue, detector background problem, or other internal analyzer fault.
Knowing when to stop is proper troubleshooting.
Clinical Use Tip
Do not troubleshoot flow cell contamination or background count issues while patient specimens are actively being processed. If urine testing is needed, have the lab move testing to another validated analyzer or follow the approved downtime process before Clinical Engineering proceeds.
Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)
CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution
Complaint
What was reported by the clinical staff.
Example:
"Laboratory staff reported elevated background counts and abnormal scattergram background on the Sysmex UF-1000i urine analyzer."
Cause
What was observed during troubleshooting.
Example:
"External checks found adequate reagent and waste levels, no visible tubing kinks, and persistent elevated background after approved cleaning."
Resolution
What action was taken.
Example:
"Analyzer was removed from service, labeled Out of Service, and escalated for bench evaluation due to suspected internal flow cell or fluidics contamination."
Helpful Details to Include (If Known)
- Background count values or failure message observed
- Whether patient results were affected or held
- Whether QC passed or failed
- Reagent and sheath fluid status
- Waste container or drain condition
- Cleaning cycle performed
- Number of background checks attempted
- Any recent highly turbid or sediment-heavy specimens
- Visible bubbles, leaks, residue, or discoloration
- Scattergram abnormality observed
- Final device status
Final Thought
Flow cell contamination and background count issues should be approached carefully because they can affect result reliability. Start with patient safety, specimen control, reagents, waste, tubing, sample handling, and approved cleaning. If background counts remain abnormal after these steps, removing the analyzer from service and documenting the issue clearly is the correct Clinical Engineering response.
That is successful troubleshooting.