On this page
Asset Type
Manufacturer
Model
What This Guide Helps With
Helps isolate unstable optical or clot-detection performance caused by cuvettes, samples, reagents, contamination, bubbles, environment, or service-level optical faults.
Step-by-Step Troubleshooting
1. Protect Patient Testing and Confirm Continuity of Care
Do not report patient results from a channel demonstrating unstable detection or questionable baseline performance. Notify the laboratory and move affected testing to another validated analyzer until performance is verified.
Expected outcome: Clinical testing continues using reliable equipment while the affected analyzer is evaluated.
2. Confirm the Exact Pattern of Failure
Determine whether the problem:
- Affects all assays or selected assays
- Occurs on patient samples, QC, or both
- Affects one optical or detection channel
- Began after reagent or cuvette replacement
- Is intermittent or continuous
- Appears only after extended operation
Review available operator-visible results and trends without changing calibration or service settings.
Expected outcome: The scope of the instability is defined. A problem isolated to one reagent, assay, or consumable should be investigated before assuming an analyzer optical failure.
3. Inspect Cuvettes and Consumable Supply
Check accessible cuvettes for:
- Correct loading
- Damage
- Cloudiness
- Contamination
- Foreign material
- Deformation
- Improper storage or handling
If appropriate, compare performance using known-good consumables.
Expected outcome: Cuvettes are clean, intact, and correctly supplied. If replacing questionable cuvettes stabilizes testing, the issue is resolved after QC verification.
4. Check Samples for Bubbles or Preanalytic Problems
With laboratory personnel, verify that samples used during troubleshooting are appropriate and not visibly affected by:
- Air bubbles
- Clots
- Inadequate volume
- Gross contamination
- Improper tube handling
- Other obvious preanalytic abnormalities
Do not diagnose patient sample quality beyond the Clinical Engineering role; coordinate with laboratory staff.
Expected outcome: Known-good verification material or suitable QC can be used to separate analyzer performance from sample-related causes.
5. Verify Reagents and Reagent Handling
Confirm that affected assays are using appropriately loaded and laboratory-approved reagents.
Check for:
- Incorrect reagent placement
- Bubbles or foam
- Visible contamination
- Improper preparation
- Questionable reagent condition
- Recently changed reagent lots or containers
Use known-good reagents when laboratory procedure allows.
Expected outcome: Properly prepared reagents produce stable detection. If instability follows a specific reagent or container, correct that issue and verify QC before stopping.
6. Inspect Accessible Optical and Reaction Areas
Place the analyzer in an appropriate safe state and inspect accessible areas associated with cuvette handling and optical reading for:
- Dried residue
- Spills
- Dust or contamination
- Condensation
- Foreign material
- Damaged or mispositioned consumables
Clean only manufacturer-designated externally accessible areas using approved procedures.
Do not open optical assemblies or attempt internal alignment.
Expected outcome: Accessible optical and reaction areas are clean and unobstructed. If approved cleaning restores stable performance, continue to controlled verification.
7. Check Environmental Conditions
Determine whether the analyzer has recently experienced:
- Direct sunlight
- Strong external light exposure
- Excessive vibration
- Relocation
- Nearby equipment generating unusual heat
- Condensation or abrupt environmental changes
Correct obvious environmental factors without altering internal analyzer configuration.
Expected outcome: The analyzer operates in a stable environment without obvious external interference. If correcting the environment stabilizes the baseline, the issue is resolved after QC verification.
8. Restart and Observe Normal Initialization
If consumables, samples, reagents, contamination, and environment appear normal, perform a normal restart using approved controls.
Observe whether the analyzer completes its normal initialization and self-check processes without recurring detection abnormalities.
Do not access unauthorized optical calibration or service functions.
Expected outcome: Initialization completes normally and controlled testing becomes stable. Continued instability indicates the need for escalation.
9. Perform Controlled Functional Verification
Run appropriate laboratory QC or other approved verification material across the affected testing pathway.
Confirm that:
- Detection remains stable
- Results are repeatable according to laboratory acceptance criteria
- No recurring baseline or optical faults appear
- Required QC passes
Expected outcome: Stable controlled results are obtained and required QC is acceptable. The analyzer may be returned to service when laboratory and service requirements are satisfied.
If the Problem Persists
If cuvettes, samples, reagents, contamination, environmental conditions, and accessible reaction areas have been ruled out, the problem may involve an optical source, detector, internal alignment, reaction positioning, temperature control, signal processing, or another service-level condition.
The analyzer should be:
- Removed from service for affected testing
- Labeled Out of Service when reliable results cannot be assured
- Sent for repair or bench evaluation
- Evaluated using appropriate manufacturer documentation and approved test equipment
- Repaired, calibrated, or configured only by qualified personnel
Do not adjust optical calibration, internal detectors, alignment, or service parameters without approved manufacturer procedures.
Return to service only after the affected detection pathway is stable and all required QC and performance checks have passed.
Knowing when unstable analytical performance requires escalation rather than continued trial-and-error is proper troubleshooting.
Clinical Use Tip
An analyzer that produces results but demonstrates unstable clot detection should be treated as unreliable until controlled QC confirms stable analytical performance.
Work Order Documentation (CCR Method)
CCR = Complaint, Cause, Resolution
Complaint
What was reported by the clinical staff.
Example:
"Laboratory staff reported intermittent unstable clot-detection readings and failed QC on several tests."
Cause
What was observed during troubleshooting.
Example:
"Clinical Engineering found visible residue in the accessible reaction area and questionable cuvettes from the currently loaded supply."
Resolution
What action was taken.
Example:
"The accessible area was cleaned using approved procedures, the cuvette supply was replaced, QC was repeated successfully, and the analyzer was returned to service."
Helpful Details to Include (If Known)
- Assays affected
- Whether patients, QC, or both were affected
- Whether one or multiple channels were involved
- Cuvette condition
- Reagent condition and recent changes
- Sample abnormalities observed
- Visible contamination or condensation
- Environmental changes or relocation
- Results before and after cleaning
- Known-good consumable or reagent substitutions
- QC results
- Final analyzer status
Final Thought
Unstable analytical detection should be approached systematically from cuvettes, reagents, samples, contamination, and environment before internal optics are suspected. Protect patient results, verify performance with controlled material, escalate unresolved instability, and document the evidence clearly.
That is successful troubleshooting.